Select Page
Order Refusing to condone delay under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 would be Appealable under Section 37 (1) (c) of the Act

Order Refusing to condone delay under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 would be Appealable under Section 37 (1) (c) of the Act

by | Apr 1, 2021 | Arbitration, Interpretation of Statutes, Limitation Act, Practice and Procedure

A 3 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court recently in Chintels India Ltd. v. Bhayana Builders P. Ltd. [CA No. 4028 of 2020] has examined the legal question whether an appeal under section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act, 1996 would be maintainable against an...
120 day Statutory Period for filing Written Statement ‘Mandatory’ under the Commercial Courts Act: Supreme Court Holds

120 day Statutory Period for filing Written Statement ‘Mandatory’ under the Commercial Courts Act: Supreme Court Holds

by | Feb 19, 2019 | Civil Procedure Code, Interpretation of Statutes, Legal Concepts, Legal News, Litigation

(Justice Nariman (Left) and Justice Saran (Right)Hon’ble Judges, Supreme Court of India A bench of Justice Nariman and Justice Saran of the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held in SCG Contracts India P. Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure P. Ltd. that the...
Section 24 (2) of the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 : Conditions to be satisfied

Section 24 (2) of the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 : Conditions to be satisfied

by | Sep 15, 2015 | Constitutional Law, Interpretation of Statutes, Land Acquisition, Litigation

Justice R.M. LodhaSupreme Court of India In an important judgment, a 3 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors. has examined the applicability of Section 24 (2) of the The Right to...